HIT
“Okay, come
on in, sit down.”
After-action
report requested by supervisor. Time set
for report assembly. Assembled report
produced to supervisor in interview location.
No record is made.
“So what
happened?”
Voice-report
capability is initiated. “I went to the guy’s house.”
“Okay. Details.”
Car taken to
object’s location. Car parked four doors
from location. Car door opened and exit
made. Approach to object’s location
taken, while surveillance of area is conducted.
Determination made that area is neutral.
Door approached and presence made known through pressure on
doorbell. Wait-time not occupied with
activity. Door opened and subject
revealed.
“So you went
to his house and he came the door.”
“Yes sir,
that’s right. I went to the door and
pressed the bell and he came out.”
“Okay go on.”
Conversation
initiated by subject and subject’s initial question processed. Identification
requested and produced. Invitation
extended by subject to enter location and location entered. Interior proccessed and requested objects
located visually. Second conversation
initiated by object and recorded.
Nice
place you got here.
Thanks, we
like it.
Your wife
home?
No, no, just
me.
Okay, about
that matter we talked about.
Yes,
yes. Listen I can’t get the money for
you right away. I mean you know I’m good
for it, right?
Memory searched for truth value of
subject statement and nil result obtained.
Reply formulated and produced. Listen
it’s not about what I know. It’s about the money.
It’s about
trust, is what I think.
Memory searched for truth value of
subject statement and nil result obtained.
Pressure upgrade permitted.
So your
kids are home?
“You went right to the kids? Ballsy.”
“No other
options were presented.”
“I’m not
questioning. What next?”
Subject
response elicited and processed. Attempt
by subject to impede further interchange elicited. Further pressure upgrade canceled and
accessory produced. Subject retreats
into location in motion Backward.
Conversation is continued.
No no
listen, I’ll just go out to the kitchen. I got the stuff, I’ll get it.
Subject’s
response processed and truth value algorithm applied. Assessed truth value of +/-
1 is obtained. Location is surveilled at higher resolution and denominated
value objects located. Accessory is deployed.
“Christ, you
shot the guy?”
Supervisor
statement processed as inquiry and replied to.
Attempt is made to produce value objects obtained from location as
requested.
“All right,
this is absolutely not okay.”
Second
attempt is made to produce value objects obtained from location as requested.
Supervisor
agitation is evinced and stillness response elicited.
“Never.
Never. Is there something wrong
with you?”
Random check
is conducted and processed, and negative results obtained with .90 reliability.
“No, boss, I
think I’m fine.”
“You’re not
fine. Turn yourself off. I tell you three times.”
Assent is
elicited by standard termination formula and stillness is activated.
Pre-formulated object uttterance selected for issue when termination process is
inititated. Memory is dumped into
general archives and termination process inititated with final object response.
“So long, boss. See you in hell.”
I've always thought that the inner workings of robot intelligence are wrongly conceived. I tried to create a robot intelligence that is incapable of reflection or perception but produced by the robot's program, which directs the robot's actions, speech, and understanding (as input). It was fun.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
Delete